Category Archive : Group officers

Philadelphia police get hikes in new contract: 3-year deal has few reforms

?? Do you like Philly? Sign up for the free Billy Penn newsletter to get everything you need to know about Philadelphia every day.


After months of muted negotiations, Philadelphia reached a deal for a new three-year contract with the city’s police union. The contract promises pay increases for officers and brings in some of the reforms defenders long awaited after a year of historic protests against aggressive police.

City police are working under a one-year extended contract promulgated by Mayor Jim Kenney’s administration at the height of the local COVID crisis.

The new agreement, written by a three-member arbitration panel, marks the first long-term deal since the 2020 social justice protests that put the PPD in a national spotlight on its use of force, and disciplinary policy critics say protect officers in charge of problems.

Some advocates hoped to bring these issues to the bargaining table. Instead, under the new contract, which runs through 2024, agents will receive a combined pay and benefits increase of $ 133 million over the next three years, while Kenney walked away with less than what he was trying to achieve on the reforms.

Officers will see a salary increase of 2.75% for the first year, followed by increases of 3.5% for the following two years. There is also a one-time bonus of $ 1,500 per officer after the agreement is ratified. Pension and health benefits would remain largely unchanged, but the deal increases paid parental leave to four weeks and adds Juneteenth as a public holiday for city workers.

During negotiations, the Kenney administration also sought to force officers to live in the city throughout their tenure, ending an earlier union deal that allows officers to leave after 5 years in the force. This does not happen; the exclusion also remains intact under the new agreement.

The administration has touted some victories. The new contract includes an increase in penalties for certain disciplinary offenses and sets out several procedural changes aimed at making disciplinary officers more objective.

“We believe the reforms… will help improve police-community relations, while helping to keep us all safe,” Kenney said Tuesday. “Although the award rendered by the arbitration board does not include everything we hoped for on this front, we believe it is a fair and positive step in the right direction.”

The contract also includes what Kenney has trumpeted as a blanket ban on officers fraternizing with hate groups – a known event in recent years – although it is not clear whether this tongue has teeth.

The Fraternal Order of Police Lodge 5, which represents approximately 6,000 uniformed officers, depicts the agreement as a victory that “100% protected” the rights of officers in disciplinary and grievance processes.

“Overall we took a few hits in areas, which we expected, and the city took a few hits in areas, which I know they were expecting,” the president said. from FOP, John McNesby, to WHYY News and Billy Penn. “I think it’s a fair deal for both parties.”

There are three changes to the Philadelphia Police Disciplinary Rules:

  • an increase in the strength of sentences for several offenses
  • an increase in the length of time certain sanctions remain on an officer’s file
  • the addition of some new offenses to the books

However, the arbitration panel declined a number of the city’s recommendations for increased penalties.

“It is important that the code is not too harsh and therefore the panel refuses to make any changes sought by the city, including removing the range of sanctions from reprimand to dismissal for a number of charges, “the panel wrote in the letter announcing the contract.

It is unclear how one of the more notable new offenses – the ban on fraternizing with “hate groups” – would be enforced.

The amendment does not specify any specific group by name. On the contrary, it broadly prohibits an agent from knowingly associating with groups advocating criminal action against a group of people, or any group that “compromises” an agent’s credibility.

A first violation could result in a 10-day suspension, a second violation resulting in automatic dismissal.

Asked how officials would designate a hate group on those terms, Rich Lazer, deputy mayor of work for Philly, said it would be decided in discussions between the PPD and city prosecutors.

The agreement will bring a significant change to the Police Investigation Commission, the department’s internal committee that reviews evidence and rules on disciplinary cases.

At present, the panel consists of a captain, a lieutenant and a base officer. Under the new arrangement, the board will include at least one civilian member and exclude any officer of the same rank as the offender from the panel.

For the first time, the contract also allows unsworn witnesses and even lawyers to present evidence to the commission.

These changes are grossly insufficient for some advocates who have criticized redundant layers of the disciplinary process – which may include internal affairs inquiries, a use of force review board, police board of inquiry and arbitration. additional union, even after officers face disciplinary charges or dismissal.

In fact, the new agreement creates another review board – a board, according to the Kenney administration, designed to make it harder to rehire really problematic officers.

The new contract creates a “Police Termination Arbitration Committee” which would see the city and the FOP appoint an equal number of trained arbitrators to review officer terminations – at least 40% of whom will be people who identify as women, people of color or some other “under-represented group”.

Kenney also said the new deal will help the city finally transition the old Police Advisory Board, a long-standing civilian oversight board, to the more powerful Civilian Police Oversight Board. This independent group, described in legislation passed by city council last year, would be granted subpoena power to independently investigate allegations of police misconduct. The group is still in the process of hiring and appointing new commissioners.

PAC Executive Director Anthony Erace praised the elements of the new deal, but expressed concern over wording indicating that any commission activity that is “negotiated” can only take place. with the written consent of the FOP.

“I’m worried because for the FOP everything is subject to negotiation,” Erace said. “The idea that a reform-oriented watchdog agency would need the consent of the FOP to do its job is outside the spirit of reform. “

In one case, the panel rejected a request to require more mandatory rotations for officers in distressed police units because the requirement already existed – and the ministry simply never implemented the changes.

Under the 2014-2017 police contract, the union agreed to regular staff rotations between narcotics officers and internal affairs staff. This reform stems in part from widespread corruption scandals that have emerged within specialist units, such as narcotics, dating back to the 1970s. Former Police Commissioner Charles Ramsey asked for rotational powers make these units less insular and, in theory, less prone to corruption.

But that change was never implemented, the panel wrote. And rather than demanding a new rotation program for specialized units, the arbitration panel instead chose to give the city and the FOP another chance to voluntarily implement the rotation system agreed in the previous contract. .

Police Commissioner Danielle Outlaw said she would work with department heads to try to make sure the changes happen this time around.

There was little public indication that the FOP intended to change rotation policies. Its tweeted opinion on the new deal informs its members that all existing “transfer protections” would be maintained.

Overall, FOP president McNesby predicted that the disciplinary changes outlined in the new contract would have a limited impact on its members.

“These are basically the same structures that we had before. There’s a little more civilian involvement now, ”McNesby said. “Avoid trouble. I mean, that’s basically it. If you get into the disciplinary process, you’re looking for trouble and we don’t want it. “



Source link

APS issues statement on high threat from Alpena | News, Sports, Jobs

ALPENA – Alpena Public Schools have closed Alpena High School due to a threat.

The district issued the following statement around 5 p.m. Friday:

“Early Thursday morning, three separate and independent events took place on the Alpena High School campus shortly before school started. Unfortunately, these events have been the subject of wild speculation and rumors on social media. This document aims to clarify what really happened.

The first isolated event involved a medical emergency on an APS bus for which an ambulance was dispatched. DPA officers responded as a precaution due to an unknown medical issue.

A second event involved a student in the hallway not following directions from school staff causing disruption to the school environment. As this event escalated and rose to the level of a potential risk to the safety of students and staff, our APS APD Liaison Officer was called in to help minimize the risk. Despite the rumor that a Taser had been used, only minor interventions took place. This incident was not linked to any other event.

A third event involved a small group of students carrying flags and memorabilia in support of another student involved in an argument on social media. The actions of this group caused a substantial disruption of the school day by creating a climate of intimidation. As directed by AHS administrators, the students removed their flags and memorabilia.

Throughout the day, the administration met with many parties to further investigate this event and determine the intent behind the students’ actions. The ramifications of the actions of a few students have had a negative impact on the entire student body, staff and community. As the investigation continued, students were held accountable for their choices in accordance with the Alpena High School Code of Conduct. Alpena Public Schools have made it clear that this type of behavior is unacceptable and will not be tolerated.

After the end of the school day, the behaviors continued on social networks, exacerbating an already tense climate. Late Thursday evening, the Alpena Police Department was made aware of a potential threat of violence against the school. Working with the DPA, the APS administration determined that the best action to keep our students and staff safe was to close the school on Friday. As an added precaution, the administration worked with the DPA, the Sheriff’s Department and the Michigan State Police to increase the police presence in each of our school buildings that were in session.

After a thorough investigation that lasted most of the day on Friday, APS is happy to share that APD has finally determined that there is no real threat to the school. It was discovered that the information that led to the shutdown of AHS was due to the dissemination of erroneous information based on assumptions from an individual no longer living in the community of Alpena. This individual had social media connections to many members of our school community, resulting in a rapid and wide spread of a perceived threat.

Students from Alpena High School will return to campus on Monday. Support for students and staff will be put in place to respond to and deal with these events appropriately. High school students and families should check the AHS Weekly Parents Update for detailed information.

We are confident that our students and our community will come together and progress in a positive and productive way as a result of these events.

As with any situation of this nature, it is our responsibility to provide accurate and appropriate information to parents and our community in a timely manner. We appreciate the patience of the community as we strive to fulfill this responsibility. Alpena Public Schools are grateful for the continued partnership with the Alpena Police Department, Sheriff’s Department and Michigan State Police for their role in supporting our district and community.

Check back for updates.

The latest news today and more in your inbox


Source link

Ohio to provide grants to police for body-worn cameras

COLUMBUS, Ohio – More police officers in Ohio may soon be wearing body cameras after Governor Mike DeWine announced a $ 5 million state grant.


What would you like to know

  • Ohio State Accepts Police Body Worn Camera Grant Applications
  • Governor Mike DeWine’s office estimates two-thirds of Ohio agencies do not use body cameras
  • Many small police services cannot afford body camera equipment and maintenance
  • Police chiefs across the United States have called on Congress to fund body cameras, making their use universal nationwide

DeWine’s office said funds would be directed to local police departments for the purchase of body cameras and associated expenses.

The state has started accepting applications for the police services grant money Tuesday. Departments have until October 8 to apply. Agencies that did not receive a grant this year will have the opportunity to reapply next year to be part of a second allocation of $ 5 million.

DeWine’s office estimates that two-thirds of state police departments do not equip officers with body cameras. The state said the grant program could help small police departments that can’t afford cameras for officers.

“Body cameras are beneficial to law enforcement officers and the public as they act as impartial eyes on events as they unfold, but most law enforcement agencies in the ‘Ohio don’t have one because they can’t afford it,’ DeWine said in a statement. “One of my top priorities has always been to ensure our law enforcement officers have the tools they need to better serve the public, and this new grant program will help remove the associated financial barriers. body-worn cameras and will contribute to a safer Ohio. ”

The Association of Heads of Large Cities, a group of police chiefs in major US cities have called for the universal use of body-worn cameras. The group called on Congress to provide funding to local agencies to support body-worn cameras.

In July, Columbus area state representative Dontavius ​​Jarrells introduced legislation in Ohio House to require officers to have body-worn cameras. The legislation would also limit when an officer could keep a body camera turned off.

This bill has not yet been the subject of a committee hearing.

The bill, which Jarrells calls “Andre’s Law,” was in response to the December 2020 incident involving Andre Hill. Hill was shot and killed by Adam Coy, a now discharged member of the Columbus Police Division who faces murder charges. Coy only turned on his body-worn camera after turning Hill.


Source link

California advances bill to remove bad officers’ badges – The Vacaville Reporter

By Don Thompson, The Associated Press

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) – Bad law enforcement officers could lose their badges permanently under a bill introduced by California lawmakers on Friday, a year after a similar measure died in the final hours of the legislative session.

California remains one of four states with no way to withdraw its officer certification despite nationwide protests over the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis that prompted reform efforts.

The State Assembly on a 46-18 vote approved what has become this legislative session’s marquee criminal justice reform measure, sending a watered-down version back to the Senate for a final vote before the adjournment of the legislature for the year on September 10.

“This is not an anti-police bill. This is a liability bill. Without any responsibility, we lose the integrity of the badge and the link with the community is severed, ”said Democratic MP Akilah Weber, who brought the bill to the Assembly.

The amended bill, she said, “provides due process for officers, provides necessary community representation and ensures that good officers are not decertified.”

Law enforcement agencies and those opposed to the bill agreed that the state needed a way to weed out bad officers.

But they objected that Democratic Senator Steven Bradford’s bill is flawed because it relies on a nine-member disciplinary board with just two police representatives and seven members with either professional or personal backgrounds related to police accountability. .

“It is extremely unfair,” said Republican MP Kelly Seyarto, one of those from the two parties speaking in the opposition. “None of the 46 other states has a similar makeup. … None of them are so unbalanced.

The measure recently received support from “More Than a Vote,” the advocacy group created by NBA star LeBron James and other black athletes.

The group urged members of the Assembly to pass the bill “so that a badge can no longer be used as a shield against liability. So that black communities can breathe.

The bill sparked an at times emotional debate, with Democratic Congressman Freddie Rodriguez saying he couldn’t back it for fear it would prompt officers, including his son, a Los Angeles County Deputy Sheriff, to ” to question oneself ”, to freeze when they have to act. , and be injured or killed.

“I, too, as an African American father of African American sons, am also concerned that they come home every night,” Democratic Congressman Reggie Jones-Sawyer replied. “There are enough protections here to make sure that (the officers) don’t get trapped,” he added.

Under the bill, the state would create a new compulsory state license, or certification, which could then be revoked so officers cannot simply move to another police department.

The Police Decertification Bill would give the State Commission on Standards and Training of Peace Officers the power to revoke officers’ eligibility for serious misconduct – including excessive use of law enforcement. force, sexual assault, intimidation of witnesses, making a false arrest or report, or participating in a law enforcement gang. .

Officers could also lose their certification for “displaying bias” based on race, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation or mental disability, among other criteria.

Republican Assembly Member Tom Lackey, a former California Highway Patrol officer, was among the opponents who said the definition of wrongdoing is too broad and too vague.

Bradford relaxed some of his bill’s requirements after criticism from law enforcement and other lawmakers.

He first proposed that four of the members of the advisory board have a background related to “police misconduct” before changing the wording to “police liability”. And instead of requiring two members to be victims or family members, the bill now requires careful thought to include those representatives.

Another Assembly amendment requires a two-thirds vote to withdraw an officer’s certification, and that officials must have clear and convincing evidence of wrongdoing.

The measure would have initially obliged the commission to adopt the recommendation of the advisory council. It now demands that the commission “consider” the recommendation of the advisory board and refer any action against an officer to a newly created peace officer accountability division for due process.

Additional Assembly changes allow the commission to suspend an officer’s license as a lesser alternative to decertification of the officer; clarify what constitutes serious misconduct; require 40 hours of decertification training for board members; and make it clear that officers retain their constitutional rights, including freedom of expression.

Bradford and other supporters said his bill was not biased against officers as the 18-member commission is mostly made up of law enforcement professionals.

MP Akilah Weber, D-San Diego, speaks with MP Phil Ting, D-San Francisco, as the Assembly meets in Sacramento, Calif. On Thursday, September 2, 2021. On Friday, September 3, 2021, the Assembly approved a bill, led by Weber, that would create a new compulsory state license, or certification, that could be revoked so that bad law enforcement officers cannot simply switch to another department. The bill, SB2 from Democratic State Senator Steven Bradford, now goes to the Senate. (AP Photo / Rich Pedroncelli)

The division would now review officer investigations conducted by local law enforcement agencies under the amended bill, although it could still choose to conduct its own investigations.

The same bill places new limits on police immunity from prosecution for civil rights abuses, although Bradford has had to drastically cut that part of his bill in response to concerns voiced by fellow Democrats.

It would only end what Bradford has called “three of the most egregious immunities commonly invoked by law enforcement” – tampering with arrests, failing to provide medical care or injuring a prisoner.

The League of California Cities was among the opponents, arguing that the bill “would eliminate the federal doctrine of qualified immunity and create a largely impractical peace officer decertification process.”

“I was heartbroken last year that this bill could not be passed by this body in the same year that millions more people protested than at any time in American history. Democrat MP Isaac Bryan said. “It’s a stain on this body. It is a stain that we can remove today.

The same California commission once had the option to revoke agent certification until the legislature removed that power in 2003. This left it up to local law enforcement agencies to decide whether agents should be terminated, but they could often just get jobs in different police departments.

Other states that do not have a statewide decertification process are Hawaii, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.


Source link

In re Pattern Energy Group Inc: Risks for Directors and Officers of Failing to Maximize Shareholder Value – Corporate Decision / Mergers and Acquisitions Update Series | Hogan Lovells

Riverstone is a private equity fund that owned and controlled Pattern Energy Group Inc. (the Company) and Pattern Energy Group LP (the LP). The limited partnership held a substantial interest in the company and, as the limited partnership was primarily owned by Riverstone, Riverstone was the majority shareholder of the company.

In 2018, the company’s board of directors began to explore a potential sale. The board formed a selfless and independent ad hoc committee, which followed many standard procedures, including identifying conflicts, obtaining advice from a non-confrontational banker and lawyer, and conducting business. a long process that attracted dozens of suitors that the special committee asked to be valued. Ultimately, however, the special committee accepted an inferior offer made by the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (the buyer), despite a competing offer from Brookfield that offered greater shareholder value.

The plaintiff alleged that the process followed by the committee suffered from many shortcomings, including allowing a conflicting director and officer to engage with potential bidders. The plaintiff alleged that the board of directors of the company had breached its duty of loyalty and that the officers of the company, Riverstone, and the LP formed a “control group” which owed and had breached its fiduciary duties to shareholders. The court concluded that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged the bad faith of the defendants and rejected the defendants’ arguments that they were protected by the company’s discharge charter provision or that any loophole in the sale process had been ” cleaned ”by an informed vote of shareholders under Corwin. The court noted in rejecting these defenses that, among other things, the buyer’s inferior offer would have been preferred and shaped by the involvement of directors and officers of a private investor in the seller.

The court first considered what standard of review would apply to the transaction. The court concluded that since the shareholders had been cashed in, the transaction was under scrutiny under Revlon. The plaintiff argued that the standard of review should be even higher – the court should view the transaction on the overall standard of fairness. The court declined to apply the “full fairness” standard of review at the dismissal stage, but did not rule out the possibility that the transaction could be reviewed later under the full standard of review. equity in the event that it is determined on the basis of a more complete dossier. that a control group stood on both sides of the deal.

On whether the directors breached their duty of loyalty, the court found that the special committee had taken “reasonable steps” to perform its duties and was selfless and independent. The special committee also hired independent consultants and spoke to several bidders, providing many with the opportunity to exercise due diligence. Additionally, the special committee refused to grant exclusivity to any particular buyer and also attempted to keep Brookfield at the table.

The court, however, found that all of these reasonable steps were influenced by the directors putting the interests of Riverstone, the LP and executives above maximizing shareholder value. The court concluded that the plaintiff had sufficiently alleged that the defendants may have acted in bad faith. This bad faith was demonstrated by the participation of certain interested directors in the meetings of the special committee and in the discussions with the potential buyers; buyer preference throughout the process, despite Brookfield’s superior offerings; and abuse of Riverstone’s right of consent over control changes. The court ruled that these issues outweighed the reasonable steps taken by the directors. Thus, the court found it reasonably conceivable that the board of directors did not meet its obligation to maximize shareholder value.

Although the court noted that Revlon allegations “do not admit of easy categorization as duties of care or loyalty[,]”The court found that the plaintiff’s allegations made it reasonably conceivable that the defendant directors acted in bad faith by (1) placing the interests of others above their duty to maximize shareholder value and (2) by abdicating their duty of disclosure. Therefore, the court ruled that the disclaimer of the Company’s charter did not justify the dismissal of the claims against the directors at the pleading stage. The court also ruled that the plaintiffs had argued claims against certain officers (who are not protected by an exculpatory provision of the charter) on the basis of their alleged conflicts.

The court further concluded that the defendants could not invoke by Corwin protections because, among other things, a majority of the votes were cast by a shareholder who was contractually obligated to vote his preferred shares in accordance with the recommendation of the board and who was otherwise interested in the transactions because he was likely to receive tax-free benefits.


Source link

Residents of northeast Portland felt ‘abandoned’ by police during clashes

PORTLAND – For nearly 30 minutes, armed protesters from opposing groups – the far-right Proud Boys and far-left anti-fascists – clashed last weekend in the streets, shopping car parks and backyards. school in a diverse neighborhood in northeast Portland.

Cars attempted to drive on Sunday as fireworks exploded on the road and there were clashes between people wearing helmets and gas masks and armed with baseball bats, paintball guns and chemical spray.

The Portland Police Department was visibly missing.

Ahead of the skirmish, the latest in a saga of political conflict that has plagued the city for years, officials said people shouldn’t expect officers to try to intervene or separate the parties.

But the lack of intervention by law enforcement left residents feeling “terrified and abandoned” and local and state leaders frustrated, in addition to further damaging the image of the police office which struggled to keep up. find its place in the city.

“As soon as the fighting started and spread throughout the neighborhood, the police should have come in and arrested them,” said State Senator Michael Dembrow, a Democrat who represents a large part of the Parkrose community where the confrontation took place. “I heard from a number of residents of Parkrose who felt exposed and betrayed by the lack of police presence. They have every reason to feel like this.

Portland is no stranger to the various political groups fighting in the streets. Almost a year ago, a caravan of Donald Trump supporters passed through town and encountered counter-protesters. Quarrels broke out between the groups and a right-wing protester was shot and killed.

Ahead of last week’s protests, Portland Police Chief Chuck Lovell said he took “legal restrictions” into account when responding to protests, with officers’ attendance history increasing tensions and the shortage of staff in the department.

The police force has 145 fewer officers than a year ago. In June, a team of 50 police officers, who were part of a specialized crowd control unit in Portland, Oregon, and responding to ongoing, often violent protests, resigned en masse after a member of the the team was charged with criminal charges.

Based on these factors, Lovell said he made the decision not to “place officers in an extremely dangerous position between groups of people who are highly motivated to clash.”

Far-left anti-fascists gathered at Portland’s Tom McCall Waterfront Park early Sunday afternoon, waving Black Lives Matter flags. About eight miles from an abandoned parking lot in the diverse community of Parkrose, the Proud Boys gathered and listened to speeches denouncing the anti-fascist movement and calling for the release of those arrested in the U.S. Capitol uprising on January 6 .

“I will say that the Proud Boys’ decision to side with Parkrose was reprehensible on several levels. They chose to stage their hateful rally outside of downtown, the usual site of protests and protests, and move it to one of the most racially and ethnically diverse neighborhoods in Portland, ”Dembrow said.

The clash between subassemblies of the two groups interrupted traffic around 4 p.m. on a busy thoroughfare in the Parkrose neighborhood and crept into commercial parking lots – forcing at least one gas station to close early – and on owned by Parkrose high school. At least one video, shared online by a Portland Tribune reporter, showed a family with young children running to their car to escape the clash.

After 30 minutes of fighting, the two camps separate on their own.

The Oregonian / Oregon Live reported that Portland Police were monitoring the fight from a plane. In addition, on Wednesday, the police had made only one arrest related to the clashes and demonstrations.

But, even when members of the group – many of whom officials say were from out of town or out of state – left the area, residents were shaken by the violent events.

Michael Lopes Serrao, Superintendent of the Parkrose School District, said he felt “heartbroken for the community” knowing that some of his students and their families were watching the violence from their homes. Community members found themselves picking up trash and leftover paint, glass and bear mace over the next few days, he said.

“It’s confusing and frustrating at best for many who live here. The people of East Portland have traditionally felt more ignored by the city in general, so I think that only exacerbates that concern, ”said Lopes Serrao. “Why would you ignore one of the areas of the city that has been historically underserved. If Portland is about fairness, then we should uplift this community and protect its vulnerability. “

The idea that the lack of police presence was damaging the already negative image of the department was reiterated by Michael Dreiling, professor of sociology at the University of Oregon.

“If the police force tries to manage their image, refusing to come forward and apply the law, when far-right extremists show up and incite violence, is not a good way to do it,” Dreiling said.

However, in the days following the clash, Mayor Ted Wheeler and Lovell said they supported the police office’s approach and said it “contained” the violence between the groups.

“With strategic planning and oversight, the Portland Police Office and I softened the confrontation between the two events,” Wheeler said. “And downplayed the impact of the weekend’s events on the Portlanders.”


Source link

An “absolute emergency” on Rikers Island as violence increases

In a statement on Tuesday, the commissioner said the ministry was committed to resolving issues raised by the observer and had worked diligently to “impose formal discipline or other corrective measures where warranted. “.

Like the federal comptroller, Commissioner Schiraldi said the department had enough staff, even though a prison officers’ union, which is suing New York for inhuman working conditions on Rikers, called on the city to hire thousands of workers. ‘others.

Keith Powers, a Democratic city councilor who heads the criminal justice committee, said in an interview that he endorsed the commissioner’s focus on improving the morale of departmental staff while addressing the issue of the ‘absenteeism.

But, said Mr Powers, “we are in an absolute emergency inside the city’s prisons.”

Benny Boscio Jr., president of the Correction Officers’ Benevolent Association, the union that sues the city, said in a statement that the letter showed the federal monitor “was working as a public relations arm of DOC.”

“The officers are sick because they continue to be forced to work in hostile and inhumane working conditions where they are forced to work 25 hours or more without meals or rest and are brutally assaulted by detainees with impunity”, Mr Boscio said.

“Fix the inhumane working conditions and you will solve the staff crisis,” he added.

Public defenders say in interviews that conditions on the island worry them intensely for the safety of their clients.

A Brooklyn public defender, who declined to give her name because she was not authorized to speak officially, said one of her clients who had been on the island since June had been repeatedly assaulted, no had not received the necessary medical attention and had indicated to a correctional officer that he intended to harm himself, to which the correctional officer did not respond.


Source link

Rock Island City Council Unanimously Approves Establishment of Police Community Relations Board

ROCK ISLAND, Ill. (KWQC) – On Monday, Rock Island City Council voted 7-0 to approve a police relations commission.

The 12-person group is to meet monthly to handle things such as building relationships between law enforcement, providing advice and guidance regarding new police hires, promoting policies and procedures that can ensure fairness and protect the rights of residents.

The vote was greeted with a round of applause at Monday night’s city council meeting. A few Rock Island residents spoke in favor of the commission during the council’s public comment session. Among those who spoke in favor of the commission was community activist and former Rock Island mayoral candidate Thurgood Brooks. Rock Island County NAACP President Bonnie Ballard also supported the commission.

The 12-person group plans to be made up of people from different backgrounds. The group plans to have at least two law enforcement officers, current or former, two returning residents or convicted felons, a university or business school student, a high school student, an individual practicing a legal profession and finally a person in a traumatic situation. job. Members will serve for staggered terms of three years. The first group will serve for terms of one, two or three years to start the group.

Members must be appointed by the mayor with the approval of city council.

The commission will not directly make any decisions or policy changes. The group intends to meet, come together and discuss ideas and then present them to local officials such as the mayor, city council, chief of police, state prosecutor’s office and the residents. They also plan to assist in the assessment of officers subject to the Rock Island County Integrity Task Force review, as well as being part of the hiring process for new officers.

The commission also plans to organize events for newly hired agents to engage with the community in events and to hold quarterly gatherings for all agents.

You can find out more about the objectives and goals of the committee here.

Copyright 2021 KWQC. All rights reserved.


Source link

Police officer on leave shot dead in Houston restaurant; suspects still at large

OUSTON (WGNO– Two suspects are still at large after killing a New Orleans cop on leave at a Houston restaurant early Saturday night.

According to KTRK-ABC 13, shortly after 5 p.m., one of the two suspects fired two shots in the patio of the Grotto Ristorante located at block 4700 of Westheimer Road, one bullet hitting the NOLA officer, who was taking a meal with a group of people.

Arms in hand, the two suspects approached the group and demanded items. Witnesses said everyone complied, but the shooter opened fire anyway.

Another victim, who was also shot, was hospitalized and is listed in critical condition.

The late Nissan Altima model was reportedly used in the escape of two suspects who killed an NOPD officer on leave at a Houston restaurant (Photos; Houston Police Department)

One suspect was described as a man wearing a black hoodie with black pants. The other male suspect wore a white hoodie with black pants. The suspect vehicle (shown above) is described as a gray or silver four-door Nissan Altima with paper plates.

NOPD Superintendent Shaun Ferguson issued a statement at 8:43 p.m.

“We have been made aware of this incident,” said Ferguson. “We are certain that the Houston Police Department will work diligently to find the perpetrators of this terrible crime. We pray for the family of our deceased officer. We also pray for the family of the second victim of this incident.

“I want to thank Houston Police Chief Troy Finner for his strong words of support tonight.

“I would also ask you to pray for the NOPD family as we begin to understand the tremendous loss we have suffered,” Ferguson continued. “At this point, we will not identify the deceased officer and we ask that you respect the privacy of his family at this terrible time. “

No arrests have been made, but HPD agents are looking for the suspected gunman along Westheimer Road.

The names of the victims have not been released at this time.


Source link

Officers and deputies escort daughters of deceased Kissimmee officer to first day of school – WFTV

KISSIMMEE, Fla – Matthew Baxter was not there Tuesday to accompany his daughters until their first day of school, but a pack of his former colleagues were there.

A group of police officers and deputies from the Kissimmee Police Department, Orlando Police Department, Orange County Sheriff’s Office and St. Cloud Police Department escorted Baxter’s daughters in their classrooms on Tuesday.

READ: Meet Baxter, a Kissimmee K9 who can detect electronic devices used in cybercrime, child pornography

Baxter’s widow Sadia said it was the latest example of the support her family has felt since her husband was killed in the line of duty on August 18, 2017.

“Their father couldn’t give them a kiss this morning and accompany them to school, but they felt his love through law enforcement here today,” Sadia said.

Tuesday marked their daughter Zarah’s first day of kindergarten.

READ: ‘It’s so devastating’: Family of murdered Kissimmee officer loses another father figure after grandfather dies from COVID-19

She said it was special to see the law enforcement community continue to support her family.

“I truly believe that seeing so much love and support has kind of relieved their hearts and although you don’t have your daddy present I know he’s watching,” she said.


Source link